HOW TO LAND ON THE MOON - Smarter Every Day 250

  • күнү жарыяланды 26 күн мурун

    SmarterEveryDay

    узактыгы: 22:58

    Get 1st Audiobook + full access to the Plus Catalog for free when you try Audible for 30 days www.audible.com/smarter or TXT smarter to 500500
    Click here if you're interested in subscribing: bit.ly/Subscribe2SED
    ⇊ Click below for more links! ⇊
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    GET SMARTER SECTION
    A very special thank you to Wayne Ottinger
    www.aletro.org/
    Check out the AMAZING website by Ben Feist that synchronizes all Apollo data:
    www.apolloinrealtime.org/
    I had to find a lot of archival footage to make this video. Thanks to Devin for helping me find the original Apollo LLTV footage from Ellington.
    A special thank you to steveslater1987 for providing the footage and audio of the Neil Armstrong Interview after flying the LLTV.
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    Tweet Ideas to me at:
    smartereveryday
    Smarter Every Day on Facebook
    SmarterEveryDay
    Smarter Every Day on Patreon
    www.patreon.com/smartereveryday
    Smarter Every Day On Instagram
    smartereveryday
    Smarter Every Day SubReddit
    www.reddit.com/r/smartereveryday
    Ambiance, audio and musicy things by: Gordon McGladdery
    www.ashellinthepit.com/
    ashellinthepit.bandcamp.com/
    If you feel like this video was worth your time and added value to your life, please SHARE THE VIDEO!
    If you REALLY liked it, feel free to pitch a few dollars Smarter Every Day by becoming a Patron.
    www.patreon.com/smartereveryday
    Warm Regards,
    Destin

SmarterEveryDay
SmarterEveryDay

We're going back to the moon, and we're going to need to train Astronauts how to land. This video is the result of trying to understand that control problem better. in the next video of this series, I'll show you footage from an actual NASA Lunar Lander software test I participated in many years ago. Also, I'd like to say express grateful I am to everyone who supports Smarter Every Day on Patreon at https://www.patreon.com/smartereveryday . If you've never considered being a Patreon of Smarter Every Day, then feel free to click the link if you'd like to see what it's all about. If not, then no big deal! I'm grateful that you're here. Warm Regards, Destin

25 күн мурун
MaGaO
MaGaO

@Almaadin Many Mars probes have crashed. If humans are aboard, it makes sense to train them just in case.

7 саат мурун
hernan jimenez
hernan jimenez

@Almaadin that was done on earth..so gullible lol. Mars supposedly is 1% density of earth atmosphere. which means no air. an you need air to slow parachute and need air for lift when they eventually fly helicopter drone. so the impossible without air debunks your Mars landing 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂🤣🤣🤣🤣😭😭😭😭😂🤣🤣🤣🤣😂😭😭

8 саат мурун
Almaadin
Almaadin

I disagree with your thesis statement. After watching perseverance land itself, I think we could definitely automate landing on the moon. It is probably still a good idea to train astronauts to land on the moon but I don't think we HAVE to.

11 саат мурун
That Scar
That Scar

Where is the helicopter video? No links?

Күн мурун
hernan jimenez
hernan jimenez

@MaGaO the moon landings where recorded like a movie, take after take till perfection like any other movie an played back to the people as it was live. so no way possible could it be interrupted 🤣😂🤣🤣🤣🤣😂. it was already recorded, 😂🤣😂🤣😂dumbass

4 күн мурун
Asophos
Asophos

1:58 amongus

Саат мурун
Wyrylka
Wyrylka

1:44 I can't take this anymore make the pain stop

Саат мурун
Aidan Gavin
Aidan Gavin

1:45

4 саат мурун
Konnies Egg
Konnies Egg

Thanks for the tutorial, just got invited to a Martian party. Heading out tomorrow night.

4 саат мурун
goutvols103
goutvols103

Another great video. It would be interesting to know more about the rocket motor that was on the lander and got it back to the orbiter. I had read something where the NASA engineers made it as simple as possible; without any electrical connections to reduce points of failure. It was basically just a mixing of two (2) chemicals by means of the turning of two (2) mechanical valves. Thanks in advance.

11 саат мурун
Carl Carter
Carl Carter

I flew a test device in Grumman hangar 5 over a mosaic set of lunar photos. All I had was a mockup of the LM cockpit. I made 3 test landing attempts for evaluation data. 50 years later I toured the hangar at the Cape Canaveral facility and in an alcove next to the Saturn V rocket was the same unit I tested at the Grumman facility. I worked at Grumman for 30+ years on the A-6 Intruder , the F-14 Tomcat,and The JSTARS . Fun years!

11 саат мурун
The Obsolete Man
The Obsolete Man

There's only three ways to go to the Moon, or one. Step one, resurrect Stanley Kubrick. Step two, rent al large studio in the desert. Step three, buy all media and political influencers to give it credibility. Or Get a bunch of wicked smaht guys to get'em there.

12 саат мурун
Traci Wagnon
Traci Wagnon

U said among us a lot

13 саат мурун
lungotevere
lungotevere

Excellent. Great job. I know a lot more about lunar landing than I did before watching this. Sign me up!

14 саат мурун
Tampa Blush
Tampa Blush

1:59 among us

14 саат мурун
Tampa Blush
Tampa Blush

1:45 amongus

14 саат мурун
Jeremy Hopkins
Jeremy Hopkins

1:45

14 саат мурун
Bradyn Austin
Bradyn Austin

Boots on the moon.

15 саат мурун
JPazer
JPazer

1:45 , 1:59

15 саат мурун
JPazer
JPazer

1:45

15 саат мурун
Derrick Fyffe
Derrick Fyffe

Hey, I know this video is about the moon, but I have had this question on my mind for a while now, and the recent Mars landing has brought it back again (and I can't think of anyone else to ask) so here goes... This is regarding the 7 minutes of terror: Do you think that it is possible for NASA to build signal amplifiers that would be strategically placed between Mars and Earth, and these would boost the signal enough to reduce the delay in communication time? Or is this still too far in the future? I'm thinking 2 or 3 satellites spaced evenly across the distance whose purpose is to catch and slingshot the signals back and forth... Thank you for your response (provided you get this message, or for anyone else who may have a theory/answer).

17 саат мурун
Chinmoy Kathar
Chinmoy Kathar

Don't you think the next lander will have highly AI assisted landing if not completely AI assisted landing? Although I agree that manual intervention from the onboard astronauts might be necessary and hence the training on earth is necessary.

17 саат мурун
Travis Weide
Travis Weide

I WANNA SEE THIS CARTOON! MAKE IT HAPEN!

17 саат мурун
Peter Hoare
Peter Hoare

What a brilliant video. Thank you.

18 саат мурун
Sadrho Gollsodia
Sadrho Gollsodia

I couldnt find video of the crane attached llrv anywhere else. Where did you get the LLRF-LLRV footage, if you can/want to answer?

20 саат мурун
Mac Kettner
Mac Kettner

Never heard of the X14 either - wow.

22 саат мурун
curtusw
curtusw

Thank you for that video that was awesome I am a space not even though I am not able to go into space but that is so cool that we had that and I bet if we go back to the moon like they want us to we need that version of or a new version of training aid

23 саат мурун
JustJoe Oleson
JustJoe Oleson

Thanks, dude.

23 саат мурун
D. Skučas
D. Skučas

1:44 ⠀⠀⠀⡯⡯⡾⠝⠘⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢊⠘⡮⣣⠪⠢⡑⡌ ⠀⠀⠀⠟⠝⠈⠀⠀⠀⠡⠀⠠⢈⠠⢐⢠⢂⢔⣐⢄⡂⢔⠀⡁⢉⠸⢨⢑⠕⡌ ⠀⠀⡀⠁⠀⠀⠀⡀⢂⠡⠈⡔⣕⢮⣳⢯⣿⣻⣟⣯⣯⢷⣫⣆⡂⠀⠀⢐⠑⡌ ⢀⠠⠐⠈⠀⢀⢂⠢⡂⠕⡁⣝⢮⣳⢽⡽⣾⣻⣿⣯⡯⣟⣞⢾⢜⢆⠀⡀⠀⠪ ⣬⠂⠀⠀⢀⢂⢪⠨⢂⠥⣺⡪⣗⢗⣽⢽⡯⣿⣽⣷⢿⡽⡾⡽⣝⢎⠀⠀⠀⢡ ⣿⠀⠀⠀⢂⠢⢂⢥⢱⡹⣪⢞⡵⣻⡪⡯⡯⣟⡾⣿⣻⡽⣯⡻⣪⠧⠑⠀⠁⢐ ⣿⠀⠀⠀⠢⢑⠠⠑⠕⡝⡎⡗⡝⡎⣞⢽⡹⣕⢯⢻⠹⡹⢚⠝⡷⡽⡨⠀⠀⢔ ⣿⡯⠀⢈⠈⢄⠂⠂⠐⠀⠌⠠⢑⠱⡱⡱⡑⢔⠁⠀⡀⠐⠐⠐⡡⡹⣪⠀⠀⢘ ⣿⣽⠀⡀⡊⠀⠐⠨⠈⡁⠂⢈⠠⡱⡽⣷⡑⠁⠠⠑⠀⢉⢇⣤⢘⣪⢽⠀⢌⢎ ⣿⢾⠀⢌⠌⠀⡁⠢⠂⠐⡀⠀⢀⢳⢽⣽⡺⣨⢄⣑⢉⢃⢭⡲⣕⡭⣹⠠⢐⢗ ⣿⡗⠀⠢⠡⡱⡸⣔⢵⢱⢸⠈⠀⡪⣳⣳⢹⢜⡵⣱⢱⡱⣳⡹⣵⣻⢔⢅⢬⡷ ⣷⡇⡂⠡⡑⢕⢕⠕⡑⠡⢂⢊⢐⢕⡝⡮⡧⡳⣝⢴⡐⣁⠃⡫⡒⣕⢏⡮⣷⡟ ⣷⣻⣅⠑⢌⠢⠁⢐⠠⠑⡐⠐⠌⡪⠮⡫⠪⡪⡪⣺⢸⠰⠡⠠⠐⢱⠨⡪⡪⡰ ⣯⢷⣟⣇⡂⡂⡌⡀⠀⠁⡂⠅⠂⠀⡑⡄⢇⠇⢝⡨⡠⡁⢐⠠⢀⢪⡐⡜⡪⡊ ⣿⢽⡾⢹⡄⠕⡅⢇⠂⠑⣴⡬⣬⣬⣆⢮⣦⣷⣵⣷⡗⢃⢮⠱⡸⢰⢱⢸⢨⢌ ⣯⢯⣟⠸⣳⡅⠜⠔⡌⡐⠈⠻⠟⣿⢿⣿⣿⠿⡻⣃⠢⣱⡳⡱⡩⢢⠣⡃⠢⠁ ⡯⣟⣞⡇⡿⣽⡪⡘⡰⠨⢐⢀⠢⢢⢄⢤⣰⠼⡾⢕⢕⡵⣝⠎⢌⢪⠪⡘⡌⠀ ⡯⣳⠯⠚⢊⠡⡂⢂⠨⠊⠔⡑⠬⡸⣘⢬⢪⣪⡺⡼⣕⢯⢞⢕⢝⠎⢻⢼⣀⠀ ⠁⡂⠔⡁⡢⠣⢀⠢⠀⠅⠱⡐⡱⡘⡔⡕⡕⣲⡹⣎⡮⡏⡑⢜⢼⡱⢩⣗⣯⣟ ⢀⢂⢑⠀⡂⡃⠅⠊⢄⢑⠠⠑⢕⢕⢝⢮⢺⢕⢟⢮⢊⢢⢱⢄⠃⣇⣞⢞⣞⢾ ⢀⠢⡑⡀⢂⢊⠠⠁⡂⡐⠀⠅⡈⠪⠪⠪⠣⠫⠑⡁⢔⠕⣜⣜⢦⡰⡎⡯⡾⡽

23 саат мурун
Atlas
Atlas

spooky

21 саат мурун
Dick Riggles
Dick Riggles

Moon landings were faked, hate to break the news.

Күн мурун
Brad Wooldidge
Brad Wooldidge

Ha! You’re an ignorant moron. You know NOTHING about the engineering involved.

15 саат мурун
Kyle Laurent
Kyle Laurent

Hate to break it to you but you are an idiot.

19 саат мурун
Dick Riggles
Dick Riggles

@Atlas Seriously, do some thinking and use logic...

21 саат мурун
Atlas
Atlas

Wrong.

21 саат мурун
Bastian Nyström
Bastian Nyström

Man I'm excited for this series!

Күн мурун
W Bix
W Bix

tgagyg

Күн мурун
Nate Shanks
Nate Shanks

This was such an amazing technical feat that mankind accomplished. Thank you for taking the time for making this video and doing in depth research, analysis, and interviews with folks that were involved in the space program. Side note: Sad to see almost 1k flat earthers have shown up.

Күн мурун
Patrick Rudolph
Patrick Rudolph

I love getting smarter everyday with your videos

Күн мурун
DeltaBravo
DeltaBravo

1:58

Күн мурун
TP Productions
TP Productions

WE NEVER WENT TO THE MOON .. OR SPACE AT ALL. GOD IS REAL AND THE EARTH IS FLAT.

Күн мурун
Brad Wooldidge
Brad Wooldidge

Troll.

15 саат мурун
Skippy
Skippy

fool spotted

18 саат мурун
Kyle Laurent
Kyle Laurent

****IDIOT ALERT****

19 саат мурун
langwaydpful
langwaydpful

Absolutely amazing! Keep it up

Күн мурун
torrace12
torrace12

13:40 *the highest resolution on a film from the 60s ever?* what i mean is that the picture is sharp enough to compare to 480dp

Күн мурун
Zach Attack
Zach Attack

It's disappointing I can't like this video more than once.

Күн мурун
RoMadSan RodMadSan
RoMadSan RodMadSan

I read Mr. Collins abridged version of his book in Reader's Digest, in a 1974 edition, when I was young, and it is a wonderful book.

Күн мурун
Dab-a-tron
Dab-a-tron

With style

Күн мурун
Zander LaMarche
Zander LaMarche

Not thrusting...

Күн мурун
Fabian Herrmann
Fabian Herrmann

Great presentation of the topic at hand again, but there where a few operational VTOL planes in the 1960 like the german EWR VJ 101 and Dornier Do 31, so not that surprised to see one on the lander program here.

Күн мурун
jirikivaari
jirikivaari

The apollo real time thing is really cool.

Күн мурун
Jin Kuang
Jin Kuang

Another reason why people suspect it is fake is because in 1960s, there were no integrated circuits. All computation was using vacuum tubes. There is no way that they could fit that many vacuum tubes into that small module to achieve the REAL TIME SIGNAL PROCESSING FOR LIVE BROADCASTING. Once you realize it is physically impossible with 1960s technologies, you will realize the truth. Hard science won't lie.

Күн мурун
Atlas
Atlas

@Jin Kuang Noise filtering would have been done at the ground stations. You know, the facilities with godzilla-sized satellite dishes.

14 саат мурун
Jin Kuang
Jin Kuang

@Kyle Laurent I know what I am talking about. This is just a small set of technical issues that are impossible to address in 1960s technologies.

14 саат мурун
Jin Kuang
Jin Kuang

@Atlas You have no idea what you are talking about. Noise filtering is a main operation for real time signal processing. Back in the 1960s there is a big room in TV station doing it. In fact, not until 80s do we start having broadcasting vehicles small enough to fit into a van. And that is 1980s. Think about what is in 1960s when you need to fit a life supporting system AND a broadcasting system into that landing module.

14 саат мурун
Kyle Laurent
Kyle Laurent

You have no idea what you are talking about.

19 саат мурун
Atlas
Atlas

Of course there were integrated circuits back then, lol. And they didn't need to do any digital processing. It's just live TV. Live TV has been a thing since the early 1900.

21 саат мурун
Jin Kuang
Jin Kuang

Landing is relatively easy. Launching the heavy life support module back up to 300 miles orbit is hard, even with 1/6 gravity. That is the real reason why people suspect the US landing and returning are fake. If you have a chance to look at the return rocket combustion video, you will conclude it was a joke.

Күн мурун
Atlas
Atlas

@Jin Kuang Rocket science doesn't work like that.

55 мүнөт мурун
Jin Kuang
Jin Kuang

@Atlas So it is an equivalent of 1 ton weight on earth. Shoot that up 300 miles and how much combustion material is needed?

Саат мурун
Atlas
Atlas

@Jin Kuang It depends on what you think is heavy. The ascent stage, completely fueled, weighted about 5 metric tons.

14 саат мурун
Jin Kuang
Jin Kuang

@Atlas I just want to know how the hack they can use that tiny combustion source could propel a heavy life supporting module high up into the moon orbit 300 miles up. Time after time after time. At the end, they don't even bother to pretend and even bring rovers and golfs on the moon surface, as if it is just walk in the park.

14 саат мурун
Atlas
Atlas

I think most of it is hard.

21 саат мурун
Antonín Hájek
Antonín Hájek

5:55 exactly, reason why america has area 51

Күн мурун
Annie Logwood
Annie Logwood

The yielding yacht expectantly guarantee because notebook electrophoretically borrow opposite a decorous creature. scared, damp jumbo

Күн мурун
Andrew Bickerdike
Andrew Bickerdike

God tier science yt channel

2 күн мурун
Alwayslg
Alwayslg

1:45 Among us 😳😳😳 nasa=among us???!!!111 among us = space game and space = nasa🚨🚨🚨😳😳😳

2 күн мурун
Doug Wilson
Doug Wilson

I still love the space program with all my heart and this video just made me happy. Thanks Destin, for the feels, and the history lesson.

2 күн мурун
Auaer Auraer
Auaer Auraer

Is this useful in kerbal space program?

2 күн мурун
CultureStress
CultureStress

This video was amazing. I hate driving a U-Haul in my hometown because I'm not familiar with how it handles--I never thought that the very first man to go to the moon had to confront the most extreme version of that feeling.

2 күн мурун
Ethan Bacarella
Ethan Bacarella

1:45 😮

2 күн мурун
Shallow Sportsmen
Shallow Sportsmen

1:45 😳😳

2 күн мурун
Paul Anderson
Paul Anderson

Beautiful

2 күн мурун
Jon Moore
Jon Moore

Ottinger "I take some responsibility for not imagining that he could have been so dumb" first of all, lol, and second of all, I've had many of those moments in my career. I don't say that to make myself feel superior to anyone else but anticipating things that might go wrong, especially when it involves other people, is a serious challenge.

2 күн мурун
Mora Mulford
Mora Mulford

The hurt badge pivotally concentrate because monkey temporarily invent given a mysterious kiss. black-and-white, brave insulation

2 күн мурун
Peter Pike
Peter Pike

How to land on the moon? The same way you land on cheddar. Boo-yah!

2 күн мурун
Skywalker Sound
Skywalker Sound

Have you made a video about Vortex Ring State vs “Settling With Power” in helicopters and the seeming controversy about the two terms between the US definitions and international definitions? The helicopter that crashed during the Bin Laden raid sent me down that rabbit hole. It’s interesting and difficult to find specifics. Would be interesting I think.

2 күн мурун
Liqtor
Liqtor

Michel Collins was the loneliest man in the universe when orbiting the moon by him self. He described it as very serene and calming.

2 күн мурун
Joe Bidome
Joe Bidome

1:58 AMOGUS REFERENCE WHEN THE SMARTER EVERY DAY IS SUS 😳😳😳

2 күн мурун
Joe Bidome
Joe Bidome

@Jeremy Hopkins no u

14 саат мурун
Jeremy Hopkins
Jeremy Hopkins

1:45

14 саат мурун
Quinn
Quinn

RAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

2 күн мурун
soopahsoopah
soopahsoopah

Carrying the Fire is the best-written book from the Apollo era, Collins is a superb author.

2 күн мурун
P5Master
P5Master

they did it in hollywood studios...EZ

2 күн мурун
Brad Wooldidge
Brad Wooldidge

Did you even *watch* the video, moron?

15 саат мурун
Juan Hernandez
Juan Hernandez

The dusty goldfish canonically need because seed currently own near a vast mountain. woebegone, aback distance

2 күн мурун
SavedBy Grace
SavedBy Grace

Seems like they could have solved their simulation problem by installing 4 smaller jets at each corner and throttle their lift to that of 5/6 the weight of the aircraft. Once they have done that, they could install the 5th main jet to move the 1/6 remaining weight and effectively have exactly what they would need on the moon. Then when they built the lunar landing craft they could do the exact same operation only to a 1/6 weight scale on the trust. Seems a lot simpler than building some giant platform crane that can in no way provide a consistent lift or 90° pull and will in no way be duplicatable on the moon.

2 күн мурун
Simetje
Simetje

My brain freezed every time you said Among Us...

2 күн мурун
Vincent Vader
Vincent Vader

According to Don Pettit, we've lost the technology to go back to the moon. Maybe bc it was a Hollywood soundstage.

2 күн мурун
Brad Wooldidge
Brad Wooldidge

We didn’t actually “lose the technology”, lol. We lost the infrastructure. Since you’re a flattard, look up what that word means.

15 саат мурун
Atlas
Atlas

We literally did though

21 саат мурун
Apocalips
Apocalips

'According to Don Pettit, we've lost the technology to go back to the moon'. According to an idiot that means all the Apollo missions were a gigantic hoax....

2 күн мурун
ronakb
ronakb

okay so i dont get it if we had to simulate the moon's gravity why not try the free fall thing, just in a very controlled environment where to simulate the moon's gravity?

2 күн мурун
yogi Halim
yogi Halim

Mr. Wayne Ottiger I love that guy. I hope more people interviewed him, keep him company and leech off from his wonderful mind.

2 күн мурун
evilsanta8585
evilsanta8585

Hold up are we being pulled down to the earth or is the earth pushing up against us? Honestly you should do a video on gravity, there are couple contradicting theories

2 күн мурун
Michael Stoyles
Michael Stoyles

Great we’re going back to the moon hopefully start making a lunar base, but it’s cool to think nowadays there are literally hundreds of space simulators, what would take a couple months of calculating some numbers would take mins now

2 күн мурун
yogi Halim
yogi Halim

are these now rendered obsolete by accelerometer and gyroscope like in a quadcopter drone?

2 күн мурун
yogi Halim
yogi Halim

2nd question, as an alternative to the frame built by nasa for testing 1/6th of the weight, can we use hot air baloon instead?

2 күн мурун
yogi Halim
yogi Halim

Can't you just remove weights, change into lighter frame etc like in automobile drag race, to offset the 1/6th weight in testing?

2 күн мурун
1nf3ct3dTT
1nf3ct3dTT

Is the new lunar landing not gonna be made by a computer? Like they did with the Mars Rover now. Would that not be way safer?

3 күн мурун
Real HIFI Help
Real HIFI Help

These guys are smart.

3 күн мурун
p H
p H

Sus at 1:44

3 күн мурун
Connor Michalec
Connor Michalec

Love this man

3 күн мурун
JACOB NEAL
JACOB NEAL

1:58 sus!

3 күн мурун
Matt Matyas
Matt Matyas

1:58 is sus

3 күн мурун
that gamer that no one knows Bro
that gamer that no one knows Bro

All you need to do to manually land on the moon is play video games every day for 2 hours a day for all of your astronaut training, doing that will allow you to have almost instant reflexes and will be able to click at 15 cps

3 күн мурун
Michael McKinley
Michael McKinley

@19:43 conventional wisdom states that the phone in my pocket has more computational power than NASA had, in its entirety when Neil Armstrong made that step.... i have reviewed the schematics, and the code, and I am going to go with it.... so now let us consider what scientists and engineers accomplished with slide rules and transistors.... Now let Us push our tools so hard, to accomplish even more....

3 күн мурун
Michael McKinley
Michael McKinley

Your interview with Mr. Ottinger is a national treasure... i was weeping nerd tears, when Mr. Ottinger said that engineers of his day were not better than the engineers of today... we use the tools we have, we stand on the shoulders of giants. Amen.

3 күн мурун
Michael McKinley
Michael McKinley

@17:00 porting the compressor to bleed off for anti torque. that, friends and neighbors, is how you get to the moon... I believe we men walked on the moon. but the landing was always a rough spot for me. i downloaded something like 30 gigs of Apollo data from the NASA technical report server. it was all rational... but the landing part was really sketchy.... until now...

3 күн мурун
C A
C A

Microsoft moon simulator

3 күн мурун
Michael McKinley
Michael McKinley

@8:02 what a delight to see Mr. Armstrong talking shop, after all these years.... NASA used a similar hoist mechanism, inside a vacuum chamber, to develop the ingenuity mars helicopter....

3 күн мурун
Yousif pro TV
Yousif pro TV

1:45 among us 1:59 among us again

3 күн мурун
aviatortrevor
aviatortrevor

They don't need an LLTV trainer to return to the moon. The landing will be automated, like spaceX. Or if it was manual, the trainer would be entirely computer-simulator based

3 күн мурун
Thomas Ott
Thomas Ott

Neil Armstrong was a gift to the world who left us all too soon.

3 күн мурун
Michelle Poole
Michelle Poole

Mr. Ottinger is so awesome!!!! Such a treat to have that conversation with him

3 күн мурун
BaNaNa JOe
BaNaNa JOe

1:45 1:59

3 күн мурун
Sam Adams
Sam Adams

How did they solve the Van Allen belt problem?

3 күн мурун
Atlas
Atlas

@Sam Adams You made the claim about the lead shielding, not me. How do you know you'd need 12 feet of lead?

14 саат мурун
Sam Adams
Sam Adams

@Atlas You're the one claiming it ridiculous. Where's your link?

14 саат мурун
Skippy
Skippy

go thorugh fast enough and in the right place

18 саат мурун
Atlas
Atlas

@Sam Adams That claim is ridiculous and not supported by anything. Give an authoritative source

18 саат мурун
Sam Adams
Sam Adams

@Anders Eriksson I wouldn't pee on Curious Droid if he was on fire. He still owes me $10 bucks he borrowed years ago.

18 саат мурун
Juan Giraldo
Juan Giraldo

I loved that answer 19:52 ❤❤

3 күн мурун
Alex G
Alex G

1:45

3 күн мурун
Random Scroller
Random Scroller

1:45 1:58

3 күн мурун
M Umer
M Umer

To this day , vertical landing had been a nightmare for rocket engineers. By the time it was not successfully simulated here on earth, yet it was managed to do on the alien surface successfully in the first attempt, bleurgh. It sounds more like a faith talk not tech talk. There are many marvelous achievements by the NASA in space exploration, that it can cover up what was technologically unachievable at the time. It would be interesting to see how one such landing could be made in 2024. With the technological advancement, It should be way easier then in 1969, devoid of the transistor magic yet. It is still thrilled with challenges and risks that can reveal the truth of Apollo landing, people have been fooled for so long. And it is this fear that has stop NASA from making one such attempt.

3 күн мурун
Roblox Virgin
Roblox Virgin

1:44 among us

3 күн мурун
Artemirr Lazaris
Artemirr Lazaris

Hey a series that you haven't done that I think would be super is a SPY series. Such as the SEAL of the United states and how Russia planted a microphone in this gift. A trojan house type warfare. How it ws remotely powered and able to transmit signals back. The interesting gadgets of today, how they can turn your cell phone into a super spy machine. IE able to hear a conversation over a km away. Microdot film and how it worked. The ability to remote power items isn't anything new, but it has interesting applications in industry and life. :D

3 күн мурун
Lukas Taulbee
Lukas Taulbee

Thinking I've seen everything then seeing all these crazy test vehicles blew my mind. Especially for the time. This is some area 51 stuff.

3 күн мурун
Peter
Peter

1:44 AMONG US.

3 күн мурун
Will Rowland
Will Rowland

The snake story! 😂 He will bruise your heel, but you will crush his head... or ya know crash a frickin lander on you.

3 күн мурун
steven palafox
steven palafox

I think this sums it up pretty well. 20:08

3 күн мурун
Amos Backstrom
Amos Backstrom

That crane could make a pretty big 3D printer

3 күн мурун

Кийинки

How Do Nuclear Submarines Make Oxygen?- Smarter Every Day 251

29:34

Light Years Ahead | The 1969 Apollo Guidance Computer

1:21:22

The Insane Engineering of the Perseverance Rover

19:42

The Insane Engineering of the Perseverance Rover

Real Engineering

Көрүүлөр 3 млн

Claiming a Flat Earther's £10,000 challenge!

11:40

Claiming a Flat Earther's £10,000 challenge!

SciManDan

Көрүүлөр 574 миӊ.

Where does NASA keep the Moon Rocks? - Smarter Every Day 220

18:59

Where does NASA keep the Moon Rocks? - Smarter Every Day 220

SmarterEveryDay

Көрүүлөр 7 млн

Why The Speed Of Light* Can't Be Measured

19:05

Why The Speed Of Light* Can't Be Measured

Veritasium

Көрүүлөр 4,6 млн

What Happens to Lasers Underwater? - Smarter Every Day 219

13:56

What Happens to Lasers Underwater? - Smarter Every Day 219

SmarterEveryDay

Көрүүлөр 2,6 млн

What happened to Turkish Airlines flight 1951?!

38:35

What happened to Turkish Airlines flight 1951?!

Mentour Pilot

Көрүүлөр 267 миӊ.

Mars Rover Landing Overview- NOW SAFE ON MARS!!!

17:18

Mars Rover Landing Overview- NOW SAFE ON MARS!!!

Mark Rober

Көрүүлөр 9 млн